<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Concepts of &#8220;Human&#8221; and &#8220;Animal&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html</link>
	<description>animals : social theory : violence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Porcaro</title>
		<link>http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html/comment-page-1#comment-44434</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Porcaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/?p=931#comment-44434</guid>
		<description>I meant to say..&quot;negative feeling&quot; towards animals...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say..&#8221;negative feeling&#8221; towards animals&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Porcaro</title>
		<link>http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html/comment-page-1#comment-44433</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Porcaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/?p=931#comment-44433</guid>
		<description>Humans are human because they are not governed by instinctual determinism...the patterns of completion that animals possess; so we have freedom, the ability to choose, as part of our human nature; and humans are unique in that they possess that universal human trait called &quot;blushing&quot; which Darwin referred to as &quot;the most peculiar and the most human of all expressions.&quot; The Russian philosopher Vladimir Solovyov placed &quot;shame&quot;, the mother of the blush, at the heart of his philosophical anthropology and ethics...&quot;the true spiritual root of all human good and the distinctive characteristic of man as a moral being.&quot; Shame leads to guilt and guilt safeguards human conscience...natural shame being the root of moral intelligence; I would strongly argue(although this may seem quite a leap for some of us) that the source of much negative feeling and &quot;blindness&quot; towards animal cruelty in our present society is precisely rooted in the absence of a sense of healthy shame and moral intelligence...even though shame is, in fact, an innate, hardwired, genetically determined mechanism; so as humans we, as a result, become less than human if we fail to develop this affect system; and of course other &quot;humans&quot; will be potential victims as well as innocent animals of all kinds and in every situation. As Mark Twain once observed:&quot;Man is the only animal who blushes or needs to...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humans are human because they are not governed by instinctual determinism&#8230;the patterns of completion that animals possess; so we have freedom, the ability to choose, as part of our human nature; and humans are unique in that they possess that universal human trait called &#8220;blushing&#8221; which Darwin referred to as &#8220;the most peculiar and the most human of all expressions.&#8221; The Russian philosopher Vladimir Solovyov placed &#8220;shame&#8221;, the mother of the blush, at the heart of his philosophical anthropology and ethics&#8230;&#8221;the true spiritual root of all human good and the distinctive characteristic of man as a moral being.&#8221; Shame leads to guilt and guilt safeguards human conscience&#8230;natural shame being the root of moral intelligence; I would strongly argue(although this may seem quite a leap for some of us) that the source of much negative feeling and &#8220;blindness&#8221; towards animal cruelty in our present society is precisely rooted in the absence of a sense of healthy shame and moral intelligence&#8230;even though shame is, in fact, an innate, hardwired, genetically determined mechanism; so as humans we, as a result, become less than human if we fail to develop this affect system; and of course other &#8220;humans&#8221; will be potential victims as well as innocent animals of all kinds and in every situation. As Mark Twain once observed:&#8221;Man is the only animal who blushes or needs to&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Porcaro</title>
		<link>http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html/comment-page-1#comment-44431</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Porcaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/?p=931#comment-44431</guid>
		<description>Man(kind) may not be the &quot;measure of all things&quot;as D.H. Lawrence once suggested and psychologist Erik Erikson points out that we are, in fact, rather &quot;unfinished&quot; human beings: &quot;The drives man is born with are not instincts...unlike animals they do not carry in themselves the patterns of completion...as an animal, man is nothing...man&#039;s inborn instincts are drive fragments to be assembled...during a prolonged childhood.&quot; (And both Nietzsche and D.H.Lawrence would have agreed!) Speaking of the importance of the &quot;animal psyche&quot;in our lives,psychologist James Hillman long argued for the need to evoke the animal as psychic presence:&quot; I have been trying to foster self-recognition of human being as animal being.&quot; Human constructs will always tend to point out differences that lead to reasons for &quot;separation&quot; in human-animal relationships rather than acknowledging a mutual dependence or &quot;sympathy of all things.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man(kind) may not be the &#8220;measure of all things&#8221;as D.H. Lawrence once suggested and psychologist Erik Erikson points out that we are, in fact, rather &#8220;unfinished&#8221; human beings: &#8220;The drives man is born with are not instincts&#8230;unlike animals they do not carry in themselves the patterns of completion&#8230;as an animal, man is nothing&#8230;man&#8217;s inborn instincts are drive fragments to be assembled&#8230;during a prolonged childhood.&#8221; (And both Nietzsche and D.H.Lawrence would have agreed!) Speaking of the importance of the &#8220;animal psyche&#8221;in our lives,psychologist James Hillman long argued for the need to evoke the animal as psychic presence:&#8221; I have been trying to foster self-recognition of human being as animal being.&#8221; Human constructs will always tend to point out differences that lead to reasons for &#8220;separation&#8221; in human-animal relationships rather than acknowledging a mutual dependence or &#8220;sympathy of all things.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Round up, January 31, 2010 &#171; The Inhumanities</title>
		<link>http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2010/01/the-concepts-of-human-and-animal.html/comment-page-1#comment-43476</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Round up, January 31, 2010 &#171; The Inhumanities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/?p=931#comment-43476</guid>
		<description>[...] Craig has a post up on the concepts of &#8216;human&#8217; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Craig has a post up on the concepts of &#8216;human&#8217; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

