Comments on: Reading (and some Writing) http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html Animal studies--and more! Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:04 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: rob http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-21395 rob Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:47:14 +0000 http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html#comment-21395 This is an odd little coincidence. Well, not really a coincidence at all, but a strange kind of crossover between two separate, but recently activated, concerns of mine. The crossover was initiated via my arrival at this blog in search of the particular post which prompted me to follow a link to a topic on another blog (which I've just know recalled or been reminded is called "Long Sunday" or something to that effect) devoted to a recent publication by Ian Hunter called "The History of Theory". The second dimension to the crossover arises from the fact that I was recently a participant in a debate (definitely not the right word) at Larvatus Prodeo over, among other things, the politics of reading. It was a debate over a review of a book about conservative opinion in the Australian Press, and so it may not seem particularly relevant to your own interests. But as the discussion may show, the book certainly generated highly affectively charged readings. In case you're interested here's the URL: http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/02/15/the-war-on-the-punditariat/ This is an odd little coincidence. Well, not really a coincidence at all, but a strange kind of crossover between two separate, but recently activated, concerns of mine.

The crossover was initiated via my arrival at this blog in search of the particular post which prompted me to follow a link to a topic on another blog (which I’ve just know recalled or been reminded is called “Long Sunday” or something to that effect) devoted to a recent publication by Ian Hunter called “The History of Theory”.

The second dimension to the crossover arises from the fact that I was recently a participant in a debate (definitely not the right word) at Larvatus Prodeo over, among other things, the politics of reading. It was a debate over a review of a book about conservative opinion in the Australian Press, and so it may not seem particularly relevant to your own interests. But as the discussion may show, the book certainly generated highly affectively charged readings. In case you’re interested here’s the URL:

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/02/15/the-war-on-the-punditariat/

]]> By: Brandon http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-18723 Brandon Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:54:04 +0000 http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html#comment-18723 Of interest may be Derek Attridge's J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. Chicago:U of Chicago P, 2004. Of interest may be Derek Attridge’s J.M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. Chicago:U of Chicago P, 2004.

]]> By: s0metim3s http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html/comment-page-1#comment-18717 s0metim3s Fri, 02 Mar 2007 03:27:35 +0000 http://www.theoria.ca/theoria/archives/2007/03/reading-and-some-writing.html#comment-18717 Can't go past "Depositions: Althusser, Balibar, Macherey, and the Labor of Reading", Yale French Studies, 88, ed. Jacques Lezra. It's up on JSTOR. Can’t go past “Depositions: Althusser, Balibar, Macherey, and the Labor of Reading”, Yale French Studies, 88, ed. Jacques Lezra.

It’s up on JSTOR.

]]>